Skip to main content
AFL-CIO
  • What Unions Do
  • Form a Union
  • What We Care About
  • Take Action
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Press
  • AFLCIO.tv
  • Union Plus Benefits

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Legislative Scorecard
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Press
  • AFLCIO.tv
  • Union Plus Benefits
Orange Text saying "AFL-CIO Store"
Toggle Search Form
  • What Unions Do
  • Form a Union
AFL-CIO
  • What We Care About
  • Take Action

Legislative Scorecard

This voting record lets you know where your lawmakers stand on issues important to working families, including strengthening Social Security and Medicare, freedom to join a union, improving workplace safety and more.

Legislators

House

Name Lifetime Score
Rep. Mary Peltola
100%
Rep. Katie Porter
100%
Rep. Jake Auchincloss
100%
See how your Rep. voted

Senate

Name Lifetime Score
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto
100%
Sen. Tina Smith
100%
Sen. Andy Kim
100%
See how your Sen. voted

 

Key Votes

HouseSenate
Date Legislation AFL-CIO Position
Sep
30
2023
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2024 and Other Extensions Act
This short-term continuing resolution averted a government shutdown by funding operations until Nov. 17, 2023. It addressed the Republican blockade of bipartisan appropriations bills, extended the Federal Aviation Administration’s authorization and safeguarded pay for federal firefighters. The resolution also extended critical health care programs, preventing hardships for workers, military personnel, air traffic controllers, and beneficiaries of the food assistance programs known as SNAP and WIC.
This legislation is good for working people
Jun
21
2023
CHOICE Arrangement Act
This bill would loosen regulation of association health plans, allowing employers to establish plans that fail to provide essential health benefits. It would also allow employers to offer health plans that are not backed by adequate reserves.
This legislation is bad for working people
Jun
15
2023
Separation of Powers Restoration Act of 2023
This bill would undermine the principle of separation of powers, a fundamental element of our government, by upsetting long-standing principles of judicial review of agency interpretation of laws and regulations. It would prevent courts from deferring to agencies’ expert interpretations of ambiguous laws. Instead, it would mandate that courts substitute their own judgment, shifting power to unelected judges and undermining agency expertise. This change could jeopardize public health, safety and financial security.
This legislation is bad for working people
See more key votes

 

 

Legislative Scorecard Archive
198019811982 19841985 198719881989
19901991199219931994 19961997  
200020012002200320042005200620072008 

Get Email Updates

Text WORK to 235246 to opt in to mobile messages from the AFL-CIO. Message and data rates apply. Reply STOP to unsubscribe. Reply HELP for help. You will receive periodic messages with updates and news about our work. Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Contact Us
  • About Us
    • Affiliated Unions
    • Executive Council Statements
    • Labor History
    • Leadership
    • Our Unions and Allies
    • Programs
    • Values Statement
    • Work with Us
  • Blog
  • AFLCIO.tv
  • Form a Union
  • Press
    • Speeches
  • Take Action
  • Union Plus Benefits
  • What Unions Do
    • Corporate Accountability
    • Social and Economic Justice Advocacy
    • Strike Map
    • Workplace Advocacy
  • What We Care About
    • Better Pay and Benefits
    • Civil Rights
    • Corporate Greed
    • Gender Equality
    • Global Worker Rights
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Infrastructure
    • Labor Law
    • Manufacturing
    • Quality Education
    • Right to Work
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Social Security and Retirement
    • Tax and Budget Policy
    • Trade
    • Workplace Health and Safety
  • Legislative Alerts
  • Legislative Voting Records
  • Reports
  • Store
AFL-CIO Seal

© 2025 AFL-CIO. All rights reserved.

  • Privacy Policy & Terms of Use